Hacktron Researchers Breach OpenAI Systems Using Anthropic's Claude
Hacktron researchers exploited a security flaw in OpenAI's public help forum to breach its internal systems, using Anthropic's Claude Opus 5. OpenAI confirmed the vulnerability was patched within 14 hours and rewarded the researchers $6,500. The incident highlights the growing risk of AI-powered cyberattacks.
Sources
Researchers used Claude to breach OpenAI’s internal systems Al Arabiya English
A security research company said Friday it managed to break into OpenAI’s internal systems using the latest software from Anthropic, exposing how quickly the technology can carry out sophisticated cyberattacks. The researchers from security firm Hacktron said they found a security flaw in OpenAI’s public help forum, run by the Discourse platform, that allowed them to take control of the site. “We immediately reported the initial vulnerability to OpenAI and Discourse and worked with them to coordinate the patch,” Hacktron said in a blog post. “We appreciate their attention to detail and fast resolution of this issue,” the post added. OpenAI confirmed the flaw was fixed within about 14 hours of being notified and paid the researchers a $6,500 reward. “We thank the researchers for contacting us and sharing their findings. We narrowed the permissions on Community sign-in tokens and revoked affected tokens and sessions,” said Drew Pusateri, an OpenAI spokesperson. The Hacktron researchers said they initially used Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.8 to identify and exploit the software flaw, but struggled to make it work consistently. After Anthropic released Claude Opus 5, the researchers said the newer model produced a working hack within about three hours. The hackers did not use Claude Mythos, a more capable Anthropic model that is restricted to a small group of vetted cyber-defence organisations. Anthropic has described Mythos as having the strongest cybersecurity capabilities of any model it has built. Hacktron said the underlying software flaw is not unique to OpenAI and is used across many companies’ products, including those made by Slack and Meta. The firm said it is continuing similar tests at other companies. The case adds to growing concern among security experts that AI tools are making it faster and cheaper to carry out sophisticated cyberattacks that once required specialised teams and months of work.